Agenda and minutes

Performance and Finance Scrutiny Sub-Committee - Tuesday 22 November 2011 7.30 pm

Venue: Committee Rooms 1 & 2, Harrow Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow, HA1 2XY. View directions

Contact: Lysandra Dwyer, Democratic Services Officer  Tel: 020 8424 1264 E-mail:  lysandra.dwyer@harrow.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

50.

Attendance by Reserve Members

To note the attendance at this meeting of any duly appointed Reserve Members.

 

Reserve Members may attend meetings:-

 

(i)                 to take the place of an ordinary Member for whom they are a reserve;

(ii)               where the ordinary Member will be absent for the whole of the meeting; and

(iii)             the meeting notes at the start of the meeting at the item ‘Reserves’ that the Reserve Member is or will be attending as a reserve;

(iv)              if a Reserve Member whose intention to attend has been noted arrives after the commencement of the meeting, then that Reserve Member can only act as a Member from the start of the next item of business on the agenda after his/her arrival.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note the attendance at this meeting of the following duly appointed Reserve Member:-

 

Ordinary Member

 

Reserve Member

 

Councillor Varsha Parmar

Councillor Nana Asante

 

51.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations of personal or prejudicial interests, arising from business to be transacted at this meeting, from:

 

(a)               all Members of the Sub Committee;

(b)               all other Members present.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note that the following interests were declared:

 

Agenda Item 11 – Major Contracts and Procurement Savings

Councillor Tony Ferrari declared a personal interest in that he was the former Portfolio Holder with responsibility for Major Contracts and Property.  He would remain in the room whilst the matter was considered and voted upon.

 

Councillor Paul Osborn, who was not a Member of the Sub-Committee, declared a personal interest in that he was the former Portfolio Holder with responsibility for Performance, Communication and Corporate Services and that he had previously been in receipt of hospitality from Capita.  He would remain in the room whilst the matter was considered and voted upon.

52.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 88 KB

That the minutes of the meeting held on 26 July 2011 be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 26 July 2011 be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

53.

Public Questions, Petitions and Deputations

To receive questions (if any) from local residents/organisations under the provisions of Committee Procedure Rule 17 (Part 4B of the Constitution).

Minutes:

RESOLVED: To note that no public questions were put, or petitions or deputations received at this meeting.

54.

References from Council and Other Committees/Panels

To receive any references from Council and/or other Committees or Panels.

Minutes:

None received.

RESOLVED ITEMS

55.

Chair's Report pdf icon PDF 305 KB

Report of the Divisional Director Partnership Development and Performance

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee received a report that set out issues considered by the Chairman since the last meeting of the Performance and Finance Scrutiny Sub-Committee.

 

Following a question from a Member, the Chairman reported that, with regard to the options identified by officers across Adults and Housing in relation to responsive repairs and maintenance procurement, the preferred option of contracting two or three suppliers for each function had been the option pursued.

 

RESOLVED:  That the report be noted.

56.

INFORMATION REPORT - Cabinet Decision Making Protocol pdf icon PDF 59 KB

Joint Report of the Interim Director of Finance and the Director of Legal and Governance Services

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee received a report which provided an explanation of the implications of the Cabinet decision making protocol and the amendments made to the Council’s financial regulations.

 

An officer stated that the Cabinet Decision Making Protocol had been approved by Council on 3 November 2011.  It brought together officer delegations and the revised key decision thresholds relating to Cabinet decision making into a single cohesive protocol.  She advised that the officer delegations at section 3b of the constitution, and Portfolio Holders’ terms of reference had not altered.  The Protocol provided officers with guidance regarding key decisions and explained which decisions were within the remit of the Executive.

 

The officer reported that the financial regulations had been updated and fully reflected current legislation and that there had been some amendments to the scheme of delegation and the processes relating to capital had been strengthened.

 

In response to questions from Members, the officer advised that:

 

·                       the Constitution Review Working Group would shortly be reviewing the  Portfolio Holder delegations with a view to streamlining the process and that some authorities, such as Camden, permitted officers to take key decisions;

 

·                       there was no ambiguity in the guidelines regarding the taking of key decisions;

 

·                       the protocol used by Portfolio Holders made it clear that officers were not permitted to take decisions that were politically sensitive, were not in keeping with current policy or had ‘unusual’ features;

 

·                       Portfolio Holder decisions could still be called-in;

 

·                       contracts over the sum of £500,000 were still reserved to Cabinet.

 

An officer added that virement in excess of £100,000 had to be referred to Cabinet.

 

RESOLVED:  That the report be noted.

57.

Revenue and Capital Monitoring for Quarter 1 as at 30 June 2011

Report of the Interim Director Finance

 

For the sake of the economy, the report which was circulated on the agenda for the 8 September 2011 Cabinet meeting is not being reprinted in this agenda. Members are therefore requested to bring their copy with them to the meeting.

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee received a report of the Interim Director of Finance, which had been previously considered at Cabinet on 8 September 2011, and which set out the council’s revenue and capital monitoring position as at 30 June 2011.  In presenting the report, the Director provided updated information on the Quarter 2 position, recognising the time that had elapsed since the Quarter 1 period end.

 

The Interim Director explained that in setting the budget for the year in March 2011, Council had been advised of a range of inherent risks within the budget estimates, and that some of these risks had indeed presented further budgetary challenge leading to forecast overspends.

 

The overspend at the end of quarter one was just over £1 million and this had risen by the end of quarter two, leading her to recommend a range of actions to bring net spending back into line.  There was evidence that by the end of period 7 this action was having a positive impact.

 

The Interim Director reminded Members that this was exactly the purpose of budget monitoring and forecasting, to enable issues to be identified and appropriate action to be undertaken.

 

The Interim Director of Finance undertook to circulate a blank copy of the pro-forma used for bidding for the Transformation and Priority Initiatives Fund to Members of the Sub-Committee and stated that she would look into the possibility of circulating copies of completed pro-forma that had been submitted. 

 

The Interim Director responded to a range of Councillor questions on the details within the report and on the additional information with respect to the more recent period.

 

RESOLVED:  That the report be noted.

58.

Major Contracts and Procurement Savings pdf icon PDF 128 KB

Report of the Interim Director Finance  

Minutes:

The Interim Head of Procurement presented a report, which had been requested by the Performance and Finance Scrutiny Sub-Committee, which provided an over arching view of how major procurement contracts in excess of £1m would be managed and provided a brief summary of Procurement savings being achieved across the Council. 

 

He stated that a review by Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) in 2009 had indicated that some £21m of savings per annum could ultimately be achieved in revenue and capital spend, including costs recharged to the HRA, schools and other bodies.  Subsequently, procurement and major contracts had been included in the transformation initiative being undertaken across the council.  He reported that this transformation programme targeted cost savings through securing sustainable change, a consistent approach to purchasing and increased compliance with council procurement procedures and corporate contracts.  He added that currently there was a shift in the council away from large contractors to smaller local businesses, which had the ability to be more responsive and flexible and less costly and that the new strategy would require officers with new skill sets in the areas of client and contract management.

 

RESOLVED: That the report be noted.

59.

Exclusion of the Press & Public

To resolve that the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business, on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of confidential information in breach of an obligation of confidence, or of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972:

 

Agenda Item No

 

Title

Description of Exempt Information

14.

Major Contracts and Procurement Savings – appendix to item 11

Information under paragraph 3 (contains information relating to the financial and business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information)).

 

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That in accordance with Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item for the reason set out below:

 

Item

Title

 

Reason

11.

Major Contracts and Procurement Savings: Appendices 1, 2 and 3

Information under paragraph 3 (contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

 

60.

Major Contracts and Procurement Savings

Appendices to report of the Interim Director Finance

Minutes:

Following questions from Members on the content of the confidential appendices, the Interim Head of Procurement advised that:

 

·                    currently on the Highways contract with EnterpriseMouchel there were between 130-135 staff who were subject to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) TUPE;

 

·                    an advantage of larger contracts had been the provision of emergency cover at peak times, for example, during the heavy snow fall in 2009/10 and 2010/11;

 

·                    currently, there was enormous over-capacity in the market place which had in the past meant that the council had been willing to pay overheads that were not in proportion with the levels of service provided;

 

·                    managers needed a more extensive skill set in the area of client and contract management.  He added that although these client and contract management skill sets were mentioned on the Highways risk register, these had not been included in the council-wide risk register due to an oversight; the Interim Head of Procurement undertook to rectify this;

 

·                    of the nine short listed bidders, two were local (although not strictly based in Harrow).  The Interim Head of Procurement undertook to provide Members with further details of the nine short listed bidders;

 

·                    examining the savings target alone would not help to identify other less tangible benefits, for example, local service provision and greater operational flexibility on the part of contractors, neither of which were easily quantifiable;

 

·                    on the Housing and Corporate R&M procurement, value chain analysis had shown that there was the opportunity for both a significant improvement in services and 13% of savings, with an overall savings potential of 20%;

 

·                    the first  work package in this procurement relating lift maintenance was indicating a saving of 25% and the Interim Head of Procurement undertook to inform Members of the total number of tenders received for this work package;

 

·                    the £21m procurement savings figure outlined in the general report included capital and revenue, but did not include the Capita contract.  The savings may take up to 3 years to achieve.  The £2m corporate saving quoted in the report related to the 2011/12 budget;

 

·                    there were structures outlined within Risk, Audit and Fraud department relating to the interface between software used by contractors and those used by the council.  Capita were qualified and skilled to provide advice in this area.  He added that the council currently used the Bravo tendering software which enabled officers to evaluate tenders on equal terms and that tender specification documents emphasised sustainability to bidders;

 

·                    tender contracts would continue to include conditions and clauses relating to performance.  Contracts would include positive and negative incentives, which would be communicated to bidders early on in the tendering process.  In the past, officers had been unwilling or unable to enforce liquidated damages clauses.  This had been identified as both a skills and management gap which would be addressed;

 

·                    previously contracts had been managed in terms of operation and service management and there had been no central oversight of the overall tendering process.  However, centralisation of contract management meant that financial,  ...  view the full minutes text for item 60.