Agenda and minutes

Cabinet - Thursday 17 September 2009 7.30 pm

Venue: Committee Rooms 1 & 2, Harrow Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow, HA1 2XY. View directions

Contact: Daksha Ghelani, Acting Senior Professional - Democratic Services  Tel: 020 8424 1881 E-mail:  daksha.ghelani@harrow.gov.uk

Items
Note No. Item

PART I - RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATION I - Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 Leadership Models

Minutes:

Cabinet received a report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services, which set out the result of the consultation undertaken in relation to the Council’s proposal to adopt new Executive arrangements in accordance with the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.

 

Resolved to RECOMMEND:  (to Council)

 

That (1) a Leader and Cabinet Executive model be adopted;

 

(2)  provision be made for the removal of the Leader during their term of office;

 

(3)  appropriate public notices be given and changes to the Council’s Constitution be made to reflect the changes.

 

Reason for Recommendation:  To ensure that the Council complies with its statutory obligation.

PART II - MINUTES

664.

Demonstration on 11 September 2009

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council referred to the cross-party stance taken against the demonstration outside Harrow Central Mosque and was proud of the collective support shown for the Mosque.  He was confident that very few residents of Harrow had participated in the demonstration, and that Harrow had a proud record of community harmony.  The Leader of the Labour Group agreed with these sentiments.

665.

Portfolio Holder for Community and Cultural Services

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council welcomed Councillor Jean Lammiman to her first Cabinet meeting as Portfolio Holder for Community and Cultural Services.

666.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations of personal or prejudicial interests arising from business to be transacted at this meeting from:

 

(a)               all Members of the Cabinet; and

(b)               all other Members present.

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  To note that the following interests were declared:

 

Agenda Item

 

Member

Nature of Interest

8.      Scrutiny Review – Extended Schools as Community Resources

Councillor Barry Macleod-Cullinane

The Member declared a personal interest in that his sister taught at a High School in Harrow.  He would remain in the room during consideration and determination of this item.

 

12.     Complaint against Harrow Council in respect of the Amalgamation of West Lodge First School and West Lodge Middle School

 

Councillor Julia Merrison

Prior to the consideration of this item, the Member, who was not a Member of Cabinet,declared an interest in that she had represented the Council during the hearings on this item.  She would remain in the room to listen to the debate on this item.

13.     A new Vision for West London’s Joint Waste Management Strategy

Councillor Susan Hall

The Member declared an interest in that she was a member of the West London Waste Authority Board.  She would remain the room during consideration and determination of this item.

 

667.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 67 KB

Of the Cabinet meeting held on 16 July 2009 to be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 16 July 2009, be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

668.

Petitions

To receive (a) a petition from Friends of the Earth on Climate Change;

 

(b) any other petitions submitted by members of the public or Councillors.

Minutes:

A representative from Harrow Friends of the Earth submitted a petition containing 86 signatures from residents of Harrow urging the Council to get serious about CO2.  He read out the terms of the petition to the meeting, which were as follows:-

 

“We need a serious commitment from our local Council.  Councils have a big say in how we heat and power our homes and how we get around.  So, we need you to take steps that will lead to meaningful cuts in carbon emissions.  Councils should:

 

·                     commit to carbon emission cuts in our local area of at least 40% by 2020 – and produce an action plan detailing how it is going to happen;

 

·                     back our campaign for more money and less hassle for Councils to do things like improve public transport, insulate more homes and install green energy;

 

·                     support a call for a new duty on Councils that fail to act on climate change”.

 

RESOLVED:  That the petition be received and considered with the report on the Climate Change Strategy which was also on this meeting’s agenda, and it also be referred to the Portfolio Holder for Environment Services and Community Safety.

 

[See also Minute 681].

669.

Public Questions

To receive any public questions received in accordance with paragraph 16 of the Executive Procedure Rules.

 

Questions will be asked in the order notice of them was received and there be a time limit of 15 minutes.

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  To note that the following public questions had been received:

 

1.

 

Questioner:

 

Dr Ben Lucas

 

Asked of:

 

Councillor David Ashton, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Strategy, Partnership and Finance

 

Question:

“The finding of maladministration was largely based on the Council reneging on its undertaking to West Lodge Middle School Governors. This finding is obviously painful to Senior Officers who went to great lengths to deny this during the complaints investigation  - is the Cabinet satisfied that the culture within Education Service has changed and that such a breach of trust would not recur?”

 

Answer:

 

See Question 2.

Supplemental Question:

Are you aware that the officer's report to Cabinet is not quite accurate?  For example, there were no Middle School Governors invited onto the amalgamated school's Governing Body and that still, even now, the Governing Body for the amalgamated school is not representative of the old schools’ general population.

 

Supplemental Answer:

The constitution and make up of the governing body is outside the remit of the Council and is the responsibility of the substantive governing body to determine.

 

Officers wrote to the Chair of governors asking them to ensure that the governing body was representative of the whole school community and the actions in the plan were fed back by the governing body.

 

The plan actually says that ‘The Local Authority should also recommend a process for the appointment of a new Governing Body to ensure that it is representative of the full age range of pupils and can move on from the current tensions’.

 

This was done and the Governing Body reported that:

 

Former Middle School representation was arranged with two staff invited on the governing body and five representatives on the working groups.

 

2.

 

Questioner:

 

Pamela Fitzpatrick

 

Asked of:

 

Councillor David Ashton, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Strategy, Partnership and Finance

 

Question:

 

"In relation to its actions at West Lodge Middle School the Ombudsman not only found the Council guilty of  maladministration but also guilty of bias against the Middle School Governing Body.  The report now presented to Cabinet by Officers fails to inform Cabinet of this key

finding by the Ombudsman.    

 

Will the Local Authority now take some action to remedy the culture identified by the Ombudsman of Senior Officers failing to follow proper processes, exaggerating claims and failing to properly brief Members?"

 

Answer:

 

The two public questions that we have are both related to the amalgamation of West Lodge School and therefore it seemed appropriate that we hear both questions and I give a combined response, which more fully explains the Council’s position.  Given the complex nature of this issue, any supplementary questions, and obviously you have one each if you wish to ask them, will be responded to in writing and included within the minutes.

 

It was accepted and an apology was offered by the Corporate Director at Stage 2 of the Council’s internal complaints process, that the Middle School Governing Body had been incorrectly advised that they could  ...  view the full minutes text for item 669.

670.

Councillor Questions

To receive any Councillor questions received in accordance with paragraph 17 of the Executive Procedure Rules.

 

Questions will be asked in the order notice of them was received and there be a time limit of 15 minutes.

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  To note the following Councillor Questions had been received:

 

1.

 

Questioner:

 

Councillor Bill Stephenson

Asked of:

 

Councillor David Ashton, Leader and Portfolio Holder for Strategy, Partnership and Finance

 

Question:

“Can you tell us precisely who will be eligible to become members of the proposed Harrow Credit Union?  For example, will anyone who lives and works in Harrow be eligible?”

 

Answer:

 

Anybody who lives or works in Harrow will be able to join the M for Money Credit Union subsequent to commencement of operations in Harrow. Harrow is going to start with its employees  and then expand it to others. We have to start with an initial group but the intention is for anybody living in Harrow.

 

Supplemental Question:

 

Are there any financial bars for anybody who wanted to join and, if members do join, will they all be treated equitably. For example, those who work for a firm and take a deduction from salary, according to our report, seem to be able to get better terms.  What is the principle of equity for all residents in Harrow and all those who work in Harrow?

 

Supplemental Answer:

It is easier to operate a scheme if a deduction from payroll is taken. It will be easier to generate a critical mass with Council employees and then extend to others. The intention is to bring people into the remit who otherwise find it hard to get credit and it will include those who do not necessarily have a standard job relationship.  We also have to be careful that we maintain a proper standard of lending but the objective is to be as wide as possible.

 

2.

 

Questioner:

 

Councillor Bill Stephenson

Asked of:

 

Councillor David Ashton, Leader and Portfolio Holder for Strategy, Partnership and Finance

 

Question:

“As part of the Transformation Project the Council is commissioning work from both Capita and Price Waterhouse Cooper.  Can Councillor Ashton tell me how much each of these two firms will be paid?”

 

Answer:

 

Both Capita and Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PWC) were appointed under the existing framework agreements in place with the Council and a budget of £500k set aside to fund the Transformation Programme this year.

 

There will be fees to pay to PWC.  There are currently no fees paid to Capita. The actual specifics of the PWC figure is not for the public domain and I will write to you separately.

 

Supplemental Question:

 

Are there any clauses in the contracts to ensure that we get guaranteed saving from the advice which they give us?

 

Supplemental Answer:

I will look at the contracts in detail and include in my response.

 

 

3.

 

Questioner:

 

Councillor Bill Stephenson

Asked of:

 

Councillor Susan Hall, Portfolio Holder for Environment Services and Community Safety

 

Question:

“A little while ago you launched a campaign for local businesses and organisations to adopt a flowerbed.  Can you tell us how many flowerbeds have been adopted up to the present time?”

 

Answer:

 

There has been a great deal of interest in this.  We already  ...  view the full minutes text for item 670.

671.

Forward Plan 1 September 2009 - 31 December 2009 pdf icon PDF 50 KB

Minutes:

The Chairman advised that two of the items marked as key decisions – Accessible Homes SPD and the Local Authority Music Plan – had not been included on the agenda for the meeting.  Accessible Homes SPD was not considered to be a key decision at this stage and would be determined by the Portfolio Holder for Planning, Development and Enterprise.  The Local Authority Music Plan was also not key and a Plan for the Community and Cultural Services Portfolio rather than a matter for Cabinet. 

 

RESOLVED:  To note the contents of the Forward Plan for the period 1 September – 31 December 2009.

672.

Membership of Cabinet Bodies

(a)    The Labour Group has indicated that they wish to (1) replace Councillor David Gawn with Councillor Phillip O’Dell as a main Member of the Tenants’ and Leaseholders’ Consultative Forum; (2) replace Councillor Phillip O’Dell with Councillor David Gawn as first reserve on the Forum;

 

(b)    To appoint I-Foundation representative, Ms Kamlesh Bahl, to the Harrow Admissions Forum.

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) Councillor Phillip O’Dell replace Councillor David Gawn as a Labour Member of the Tenants’ and Leaseholders’ Consultative Forum;

 

(2)  Councillor David Gawn replace Councillor Phillip O’Dell as first Labour Reserve on the Tenants’ and Leaseholders’ Consultative Forum;

 

(3)  Ms Kamlesh Bahl, I-Foundation representative, be appointed to the Harrow Admissions Forum.

 

Reason for Decision:  To enable the changes in membership to be implemented prior to the next meetings of the bodies concerned.

673.

Scrutiny Review - Extended Schools as Community Resources pdf icon PDF 61 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Children’s Services, and reference from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting held on 11 June 2009.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Schools and Children’s Development introduced the report, which set out the response from Children’s Services to the recommendations of the scrutiny review of Extended Schools as Community Resources.  The Portfolio Holder welcomed the co-opted member of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee who had participated in the Review and congratulated the Review Group on producing an excellent piece of work.  She was pleased with the proposal to hold a Challenge Panel in six months’ time to review the implementation of the recommendations.

 

The Portfolio Holder added that officers were working with clusters and various Partners in this regard, and that the concept of extended schools was also a priority for the Council.

 

An officer welcomed the recommendations of the Review Group, which were supported by the schools.  She was pleased that good practice was being shared.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Community and Cultural Services welcomed the recommendations of the Review Group and the progress made on developing and embedding of extended schools as a community resource.

 

RESOLVED:  That the response to the recommendations of the Overview and Scrutiny Review Report – Extended Schools as Community Resources be endorsed.

 

Reasons for Decision:  To enhance future planning and delivery of the extended schools programme.

 

[See also Minute 666].

674.

Progress on Scrutiny Projects pdf icon PDF 23 KB

For consideration

Minutes:

 

RESOLVED:  To receive and note the current progress of the scrutiny reports.

675.

Key Decision: Risk Management pdf icon PDF 49 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Finance

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Corporate Director of Finance introduced the report, which set out the current position with regard to risk management within the Council and sought approval of the associated strategy.  She stated that a key aspect of the Strategy was the joint work being done with the Partners instead of the Council working in isolation.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the current risk management position be noted;

 

(2)  the Risk Management Strategy and the Policy for 2009/10 be approved.

 

Reason for Decision:  To ensure Cabinet was aware of the progress being made in Risk Management and the long and short-term activities planned which form the Risk Management Strategy.

676.

Revenue and Capital Monitoring 2009/10 pdf icon PDF 75 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Finance

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council and Strategy, Partnership and Finance Portfolio Holder referred to the report, which set out the Council’s revenue and capital forecast position for 2009?10.  He stated that the report provided a summary of the current situation and that a detailed report would be presented to Cabinet in October 2009.

 

The Corporate Director of Finance drew Members’ attention to the projected overspend in Children’s Services which was mainly due to the underlying pressures carried forward from 2008/09.  She highlighted the underspend in other Directorates, and did not foresee any potential problems with the Housing Revenue Account.  She referred to the need to a virement of a budget and it was

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the revenue and capital forecast outturn position for 2009?10 be noted;

 

(2)  a virement of £304,000 from the Local Authority Business Growth Incentives (LABGI) to fund high priority expenditure in Economic Development, Place Shaping, be approved;

 

(3)  the Corporate Directors report back to the October 2009 Cabinet meeting clearly setting out the implications of the 2008/09 outturn.

 

Reason for Decision:  To present the forecast financial position and the actions required.

677.

Key Decision: Future Organisation of Priestmead First School and Priestmead Middle School pdf icon PDF 85 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Schools and Children’s Development

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Schools and Children’s Development introduced the report, which sought the amalgamation of Priestmead First and Middle Schools with effect from 1 January 2010.  It was noted that the statutory proposals had been published in June 2009 to effect the amalgamation and that no objections had been received during the representation period. 

 

Members were informed that, as part of the proposals, a technical adjustment would be required and Cabinet’s authority to delegate the responsibility to the Portfolio Holder to determine additional statutory proposals was also being sought.

 

The Leader of the Council reported on the change to the reason for recommendation.

 

Cabinet, having had regard to the statutory and non-statutory guidance provided by the Department for Children, Schools and Families

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the statutory proposals to close Priestmead First School and extend the age range and expand the capacity of Priestmead Middle School to effect the amalgamation of the two schools from 1 January 2010 be agreed;

 

(2)  statutory notices be published early in 2010 to clarify the school reorganisation position in September 2010;

 

(3)  the Portfolio Holder for Schools and Children’s Development be authorised to determine the additional statutory proposals.

 

Reason for Decision:  To allow the two very successful schools to come together as one school and continue to improve even further.

678.

Complaint against Harrow Council in respect of the Amalgamation of West Lodge First School and West Lodge Middle School pdf icon PDF 29 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Children’s Services

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cabinet considered a report of the Corporate Director of Children’s Services, which set out the findings of the Ombudsman following consideration of a complaint against the Council regarding the amalgamation of West Lodge First and Middle Schools.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Children’s Services apologised for the failings in the process.  She added that the school was flourishing and making good progress and emphasised the need to move forward in a positive manner.

 

The Director of Schools and Children’s Development stated that the purpose of the report was to inform Cabinet of the outcome of the Ombudsman’s investigation into the complaints from three local residents.  The Ombudsman had ruled that the Council had made errors during the process and upheld the complaint that there was maladministration.  However, in his assessment, the Ombudsman concluded that even without maladministration, the outcome for the schools would not have been different.  The Director apologised to the complainants for the failings in the process although she considered that the judgement reached on the future of the schools had been the right one.

 

Letters from the Ombudsman to the complainants and to the Council were circulated to Members of Cabinet at the meeting.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the recommendations of the Local Government Ombudsman and the implementation of the settlement proposal be noted;

 

(2)  the improvements made to managing Complaints and Amalgamations at Annexe C to the report of the Corporate Director of Children’s Services be noted.

 

Reason for Decision:  To fulfil the Local Government Ombudsman’s recommendations.

 

[See also Minute 666].

679.

Key Decision: A new Vision for West London's Joint Waste Management Strategy pdf icon PDF 93 KB

Report of the Divisional Director of Environmental Services

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cabinet received a report of the Divisional Director of Environment, on a new vision for the Joint Waste Strategy, which covered West London Waste Authority (WLWA) and the six constituent authorities.  The Divisional Director stated that there was a statutory requirement to have a waste strategy in place.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Environment Services and Community Safety commended the report to Cabinet and was proud of Harrow’s current performance on recycling.  Amongst the six constituent authorities, Harrow recycled more than its neighbours.

 

RESOLVED:  That the addendum to the existing West London Waste Authority Joint Waste Strategy be endorsed.

 

Reason for Decision:  To ensure that the revised Joint Waste Strategy was endorsed by the six constituent authorities of the WLWA.

 

[See also Minute 666].

680.

Key Decision: London Borough of Harrow - Waste Management Strategy - Adoption pdf icon PDF 169 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Community and Environment

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Environment and Community Safety introduced the report, which sought approval of the draft Waste Management Strategy following public consultation.  It was noted that public consultation on the draft Strategy had been concluded on 15 May 2009 and the key issues raised had been considered and, where necessary, the Strategy had been amended.

 

The Portfolio Holder stated that the three-bin system in Harrow had been fully embedded and was pleased to report that households were recycling more now.  She hoped that Harrow would exceed the 50% recycling target of 2010/11 and that it would depend on the availability of funding for the introduction of recycling by occupiers of flats.

 

RESOLVED:  That the Waste Management Collection Strategy be adopted.

 

Reason for Decision:  To ensure effective use of natural resources and consolidate existing policy.

681.

Key Decision: Climate Change Strategy - Adoption pdf icon PDF 271 KB

Report of the Divisional Director of Environmental Services

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cabinet received a report of the Divisional Director of Environment, which referred to the Council’s commitment to address the impacts of climate change having signed the Nottingham Declaration in 2007.  It was noted that the draft Climate Change Strategy had been considered by Cabinet at its meeting on 15 January 2009 following which public consultation was undertaken from 2 February to 15 May 2009.  Issues raised by the respondents had been considered and the Strategy amended as a result.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Environment Services and Community Safety thanked representatives of Harrow Friends of the Earth for their petition, and referred to the Council’s commitment on reducing carbon emission.  She was supportive of their campaign for more money to help Councils to implement changes and make improvements that were sustainable.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Planning Development and Enterprise stated that she too was committed to the green agenda having been instrumental in proposing that the Council’s sign the Nottingham Declaration.  She was keen to ensure that the planning process met the requirements of the Strategy.

 

The Divisional Director of Environment thanked residents and organisations for their responses during the consultation period.  He explained that some measures would be implemented jointly with the Council’s Partners, and that further investment would be necessary to take the agenda forward.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan for 2009/10 to 2011/12 be adopted;

 

(2)  the start of the Carbon Reduction Commitment in April 2010 be noted.

 

Reason for Decision:  To enable the Council to meet its Carbon Reduction commitment, reduce its energy costs and inform the Local Development Framework (LDF).

 

[See also Minute 668].

KEY

682.

Key Decision: Proposed Assessment Process

Report of the Corporate Director of Community and Environment and recommendation from the Grants Advisory Panel meeting held on 8 September 2009.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Community and Cultural Services introduced the report, which set out the proposed assessment process and revised summary grants report template that were agreed at the Grant Advisory Panel meeting on 8 September 2009.  The Portfolio Holder stated that this would enable greater clarity and transparency of the grants criteria and process.  She welcomed the input of the voluntary and community sector in this regard.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the proposed grant tool be approved;

 

(2)  the revised summary grants report template be approved.

 

Reasons for Decision:  To address the recommendations raised in the Overview and Scrutiny Review: “Delivering a Strengthened Voluntary and Community Sector for Harrow”(December 2008); and to ensure greater clarity and transparency in the grants process for round 2010/11. 

683.

Key Decision: Credit Union pdf icon PDF 92 KB

Report of the Corporate Director of Place Shaping

Minutes:

The Corporate Director of Place Shaping introduced the report, which set out a proposal to enable the provision of credit union services to people living and working in Harrow.  The Corporate Director stated that a number of scenarios had been examined as part of the feasibility process.  The scheme would come into operation in 2010.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) officers continue to work with M for Money Credit Union, to facilitate the establishment of a Credit Union in Harrow to serve people living and working in the Borough;

 

(2)  budget resources be allocated from the Economic Contingency, to enable the establishment, commissioning and development of a Credit Union:-

 

2010/11

-        £13,000

2011/12

-        £12,000

 

(3)  a loan of up to £50,000 be provided to M for Money, to be used as a “line of credit”, to enable the provision of loans soon after the commencement of Credit Union services, within Harrow, and the resource be accounted for on the balance sheet, and therefore not impact on the revenue account;

 

(4)  the Corporate Director Place Shaping, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, determine who should initially represent Harrow Council on the M for Money Board of Directors.

 

Reason for Decision:  To increase the range of regulated financial services available to residents during a period of national economic recession. To provide support for residents, during the recession and “Improve Support for Vulnerable People” and “Build Stronger Communities” as part of the Council’s Corporate priorities.

684.

Member Development - Future Operating Arrangements pdf icon PDF 72 KB

Report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Legal and Governance Services introduced the report, which set out the proposals concerning the re-designation of Member Development Panel to become a Cabinet Advisory Panel in light of its increasing focus on individual Member Development and the Council’s ambition to attain a Member Development Charter.

 

RESOLVED:  That (1) the Member Development Panel be established as a Cabinet Advisory Panel, reporting to the Leader of the Council as part of his Portfolio for Strategy, Partnership and Finance;

 

(2)  having considered the comments of the Standards Committee in relation to the size, political composition and working arrangements of the Panel, the terms of reference, attached at Appendix C to the minutes, the membership of the Panel and the Chair elect, as set out below, be agreed as part of the future operating arrangements:

 

 

Conservative

 

(3)

Labour

 

(2)

 

I.

Members

 

 

Jean Lammiman

Paul Osborn

Yogesh Teli (CH)

 

 

B E Gate

Phillip O’Dell

 

II.

Reserve

Members

1.   Mrs Myra Michael

2.   Mrs Vina Mithani     

3.   Husain Akhtar

1.   David Perry            

2.   Nana Asante

 

 

Reason for Decision:  To improve the opportunities available for Member Development in line with the Council’s ambitions and to better meet the anticipated growing area of individual Member Development opportunities.

685.

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 Leadership Models pdf icon PDF 75 KB

Report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services

Minutes:

(See Recommendation I).

686.

Timetable for the Preparation and Consideration of Statutory Plans and Strategies 2009/10 pdf icon PDF 28 KB

Report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services

Minutes:

Cabinet considered a report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services, which sought to vary the timetable in respect of one plan, the Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Development Plan Document.

 

RESOLVED:  That the timetable for the preparation and consideration of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document, be varied in that the Plan be reported to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 12 October 2009 instead of 24 September 2009, as previously reported.

 

Reason for Decision:  Cabinet had previously agreed the timetable in order to comply with the requirements of paragraph 3 of the Budget and Policy Framework Procedure Rules set out in Section 4C of the Council’s Constitution.  It was therefore necessary to seek Cabinet’s agreement to vary the timetable.

687.

Lynne Margetts, Scrutiny Manager

Minutes:

Cabinet sent their best wishes to Lynne Margetts, Scrutiny Manager, who was recovering from a major operation.

Minutes Appendix A - Ombudsman Letter 15 April 2009 pdf icon PDF 33 KB

Minutes Appendix B - Letter to Council 11-06-09 pdf icon PDF 67 KB

Minutes Appendix C - Member Development Panel Terms of Reference pdf icon PDF 11 KB