Agenda and minutes

(Council Tax), Council - Thursday 19 February 2009 7.30 pm

Venue: Council Chamber Harrow Civic Centre

Contact: Pauline Ferris, Senior Professional - Democratic Services  Tel: 020 8424 1269 E-mail:  pauline.ferris@harrow.gov.uk

Items
Note No. Item

308.

MINUTE'S SILENCE

Minutes:

Having opened the meeting, the Mayor requested Council to remain standing and to observe a minute’s silence in memory of former Councillors Janet Skipworth, Bill Williams and David Rogers and former Mayoress Frances Bourne and former Mayor Graham Hines, who had died since the last Council meeting.

 

Enc.

309.

COUNCIL MINUTES pdf icon PDF 9 KB

That the minutes of the meeting held on 30th October 2008 be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 30 October 2008 be signed as a correct record.

 

310.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

To receive declarations of personal or prejudicial interests arising from business to be transacted at this meeting, from all Members of the Council.

Minutes:

The Mayor invited appropriate declarations of interest by Members of the Council in respect of the business on the Summons.

 

(i)                   Item 7 on the Summons – Revenue Budget 2009/10 to 2011/12

A number of Members declared personal interests in the above item (set out at Appendix I to these Minutes) and accordingly remained in the Chamber and took part in the debate and voting on this item.

 

(ii)                 Item 14 on the Summons – Motions:  Ghurkha Rights

Councillor Tony Ferrari declared a personal interest in the above item as a member of the Ghurkha Trust Fundraiser Panel, but considered that he could still speak and vote thereon.

311.

MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS pdf icon PDF 34 KB

To receive any announcements from the Mayor.

 

[Note:  Information as to recent Mayoral engagements will be tabled].

Minutes:

The Mayor spoke briefly on several of his recent engagements.  He expressed his gratitude to the Deputy Mayor (Councillor Eric Silver) and Councillor Lurline Champagnie for representing him at certain events.

 

The Mayor then reminded Members of upcoming engagements, requesting that Members note the engagements within their diaries.

 

The Mayor also noted with pleasure the attendance of a Harrow Youth Parliament representative.

 

RESOLVED:  That the report of the Worshipful the Mayor upon his official duties, as tabled, be noted and received.

 

312.

PROCEDURAL MOTIONS pdf icon PDF 18 KB

To receive and consider any procedural motions by Members of the Council in relation to the conduct of this Meeting.

Minutes:

(i)                   The Mayor moved a procedural motion under Rule 15.6 that the Motion included at Item 14(2) of the Summons be considered after item 6 (Public Questions). 

 

(ii)                 The Mayor moved a procedural motion under the general provisions of Rule 15.6 that the Motion included at Item 14(1) of the Summons be considered after Item 10 (Harrow Corporate Plan 2009/12). 

 

(iii)                The Mayor announced that following the issue of the Council Summons, he had agreed, under Council Procedure Rule 7.2, to the addition of a new item of business to the Summons, namely “Item 12(A) – Amendments to Committees and Outside Body Appointments”.

 

(iv)               The Council received notification in the tabled papers of an Urgent Motion, relating to the Sustainable Communities Act. 

 

(v)                 The Leader of the Council, Councillor David Ashton, moved a procedural motion under Rule 26.1 that the rules of debate be varied, as set out in the tabled documents, for the purposes of the debate on the Revenue Budget, and that the tabled procedure be also applied to the debate on the Treasury Management Strategy and Prudential Indicators, the Capital Programme and the Corporate Plan insofar as the recommendations and amendments be debated jointly. 

 

(vi)               Councillor Bill Stephenson rose and asked whether the Leader of the Council would make a statement on the position of Councillor Mrs Kinnear.  The Leader of the Council advised that Councillor Mrs Kinnear had been expelled from the Conservative Group.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 the procedural motion under Rule 15.6, seeking that the Motion included at Item 14(2) of the Summons be considered after Item 6 (Public Questions), be agreed;

 

(2)                 the procedural motion under Rule 15.6, seeking that the Motion included at Item 14(1) of the Summons be considered after Item 10 (Harrow Corporate Plan 2009/12), be agreed;

 

(3)                 the Urgent Motion be admitted to the Summons under Rule 15.2 as Item 14(3) (Sustainable Communities Act);

 

(4)                 the partial suspension under Rule 26.1 of Rules 14.1 and 17 regarding the moving of  Recommendations from Cabinet and the rules of debate (including extended time for opening speeches by all three political groups) as set out in the tabled papers, be approved for the purposes of the debate on Items 7 (Revenue Budget 2009/10 to 2011/12), 8 (Treasury Management Strategy 2009/10 and Prudential Indicators 2009/10 – 2011/12), 9 (Capital Programme 2009/10 – 2011/12) and 10 (Harrow Corporate Plan 2009/12).

 

313.

PETITIONS

To receive any petitions to be presented:

 

(i)                 by a representative of the petitioners;

(ii)               by a Councillor, on behalf of petitioners; or

(iii)             by the Mayor, on behalf of petitioners.

Minutes:

No petitions were presented in accordance with Rule 11.

 

314.

PUBLIC QUESTIONS pdf icon PDF 12 KB

A period of up to 15 minutes is allowed for members of the public to ask questions of members of the Executive, Portfolio Holders and Chairmen of Committees, of which notice has been received no later than 5.00 pm two clear working days prior to the day of this Meeting.

 

[Note:  Any such questions received will be tabled].

Minutes:

The following question had been submitted by a member of the public in accordance with Rule 12.3:-

 

QUESTION BY

 

QUESTION OF

TEXT OF QUESTION

Peter McLoughlin

Councillor Chris Mote (responded to by Councillor David Ashton in his absence)

“Is the Council aware that the Dean of Media Arts and Design based on the Harrow campus of the University of Westminster has proposed the closure of the Harrow BA Ceramics?  Are you also aware that this course has a widespread international reputation for its outstanding quality of both teaching and research and has served the local boroughs for nearly 50 years?  Is the Council aware of the widespread and gathering campaign across the arts and crafts world both within the UK and internationally to save this gem of a course?  Will the Council approach the Vice Chancellor (Prof Geoff Petts) to seek a meeting with him to reverse this short sighted and foolish decision?”

 

[Note:  Under the provisions of Rule 12.7, the question was answered orally by the Leader of the Council.  The member of the public asked a supplementary question, which was also answered orally].

 

315.

REVENUE BUDGET 2009/10 TO 2011/12

Recommendation II:

Cabinet  

(12 February 2009)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

(i)                   Further to Item 7 on the Summons, the Council received Recommendation II of the Cabinet meeting held on 12 February 2009.

 

(ii)                 The Leader of the Council, Councillor David Ashton, formally moved the Recommendation.

 

(iii)                The Labour Group tabled an amendment to the Recommendation.  Councillor Bill Stephenson moved and Councillor Phillip O’Dell seconded the amendment, which included specific proposals for the Authority’s budget for 2009/10, a revised Medium Term Budget Strategy and a revised model Council Tax resolution, on the basis of those proposals. 

 

(iv)               Further to the decision outlined at Resolution 312 above, the amendment and the Recommendation were debated jointly.

 

(v)                 Further to the amendments submitted, a proposal to vote upon the amendments individually was voted upon but not carried.

 

(vi)               Following a full debate, the amendments outlined at (iii) above were voted upon but not carried.

 

(vii)              Upon the meeting moving to a vote upon the substantive Recommendation this was carried and adopted.

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Recommendation be adopted in the following form:

 

(1)                 The 2009/10 Revenue Budget be approved to enable the Council Tax for 2009/10 to be set;

 

(2)                 The model Council Tax Resolution set out below be approved;

 

Council Tax Resolution 2009/10

 

(1)

To note that at its meeting on 18 December 2008 the Council calculated the amount of 85,755 as its Council Tax Base for the year 2009-2010 in accordance with Regulation 3 of the Local Authorities (Calculation of Council Tax Base) Regulations 1992 made under Section 33 (5) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.

 

(2)

That the following amounts be now calculated by the Council for the year 2009?2010, in accordance with Sections 32 to 36 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992:

 

 

(i)

Being the aggregate of the amounts which the Council estimates for the items set out in Section 32 (2) (a) to (e) of the Act. (Gross expenditure)

£532,402,127

 

 

 

(ii)

Being the aggregate of the amounts which the Council estimates for the items set out in Section 32 (3)(a) to (c) of the Act. (Gross income including use of reserves)

£363,563,769

 

 

 

(iii)

Being the amount by which the aggregate at (i) above exceeds the aggregate at (ii) above, calculated by the Council, in accordance with Section 32(4) of the Act, as its budget requirement for the year.

 

 

 

£168,838,358

 

 

 

(iv)

Being the aggregate of the sums which the Council estimates will be payable for the year into its General Fund in respect of redistributed non-domestic rates, revenue support grant, reduced by the amount of the sums which the Council estimates will be transferred in the year to its General Fund from its Collection Fund in accordance with Section 97(4) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (Collection Fund Surplus)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

£67,085,763

 

 

 

(v) 

Being the amount to be raised from Council Taxes Calculated as the amount at 2 (iii) above less the amount at 2 (iv) above.

£101,752,595

 

 

 

 

 

(vi) 

Being the amount at (v) divided by the Council Tax Base, calculated by the Council at  ...  view the full minutes text for item 315.

316.

TREASURY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2009/10 & PRUDENTIAL INDICATORS

Recommendation IV:

Cabinet  

(12 February 2009)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 8 on the Summons, the Leader of the Council, Councillor David Ashton, moved Recommendation IV of the Cabinet meeting on 12 February 2009.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 the Treasury Management Strategy and Prudential Indicators be approved;

 

(2)                 the Minimum Revenue Provision Policy and Strategy for 2009/10 be approved;

 

(3)                 the new MRP requirements be implemented with effect from 1 April 2007.

 

317.

CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2009/10 - 2011/12

Recommendation III

(to endorse):

Cabinet  

(12 February 2009)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 9 on the Summons, the Leader of the Council, Councillor David Ashton, moved Recommendation III of the Cabinet meeting on 12 February 2009.

 

RESOLVED:  That the Capital Programme for 2009/10 to 2011/12 be endorsed.

 

318.

HARROW CORPORATE PLAN 2009/12

Recommendation I:

Cabinet  

(12 February 2009)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

(i)                   Further to Item 10 on the Summons, with the assent of the Council, Councillor Paul Osborn formally moved Recommendation I of the Cabinet meeting of 12 February 2009 on behalf of the Leader of the Council.

 

(ii)                 The Labour Group tabled an amendment to the Recommendation. Councillor Bill Stephenson moved and Councillor Phillip O’Dell seconded the amendment, which involved the addition of a new Corporate Priority and four associated flagship actions.

 

(iii)                Further to the decision outlined at Resolution 312 above, both amendments and the Recommendation were debated jointly.

 

(iv)               Following a full debate, the amendment outlined at (ii) above was voted upon but not carried.

 

(v)                 Upon the meeting moving to a vote upon the substantive Recommendation this was carried and adopted.

 

RESOLVED:  That the Corporate Plan 2009/12 be approved, and the Leader of the Council be authorised to approve final changes, particularly relating to information on performance assessment.

 

Enc.

319.

JOINT OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE TO REVIEW ACUTE STROKE AND MAJOR TRAUMA SERVICES IN LONDON pdf icon PDF 10 KB

Recommendation I:

Overview and Scrutiny Committee

(26 January 2009)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 11 on the Summons, the Council received Recommendation I from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting held on 26 January 2009.  The Recommendation was formally moved by Councillor Stanley Sheinwald.

  

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 Councillor Vina Mithani be appointed as the Council’s representative on the pan?London Joint Overview and Scrutiny Committee for the second stage of the Healthcare for London consultation; and

 

(2)                 Councillor Margaret Davine be appointed as the Council’s reserve representative.

 

320.

AMENDMENT TO REPRESENTATIVES ON OUTSIDE BODIES pdf icon PDF 16 KB

To receive proposals for changes in representation on the identified outside bodies as follows:

 

 COMMITTEE

Representative

to be replaced

 

New Representative

POLITICAL GROUP HOLDING NOMINATION

 

Harrow Refugee & Minorities Forum

 

Councillor

Chris Noyce

 

Councillor Paul Scott

 

Liberal Democrat

 

North London Collegiate Governing Body

 

Councillor

John Cowan

 

To be advised

 

Conservative

 

 

FOR DECISION

Minutes:

Item 12 on the Summons provided for the receipt of proposals from the Political Groups as to the appointment of representatives of the Authority to two outside bodies for the remainder of the Municipal Year 2008/09.

 

RESOLVED:  That the following appointments for the remainder of the Municipal Year 2008/09 be approved:

 

Name of Outside Body

 

Name of Councillor

 

Harrow Refugee and Minorities Forum

 

Councillor Paul Scott

North London Collegiate School Board of Governors

Councillor Husain Akhtar (nominee)

 

321.

AMENDMENTS TO COMMITTEE AND OUTSIDE BODY APPOINTMENTS

Minutes:

Further to Resolution 312 above, the Leader of the Council, under the general provisions of Rule 14.1, moved proposals for various amendments to Committee memberships and outside body appointments, which were agreed, as follows:

 

Name of Committee

 

Name of Councillor to be replaced

 

Appointee for the remainder of 2008/09

Political Group holding nomination

 

Licensing and General Purposes Committee

 

Councillor Mrs Kinnear

Councillor Salim Miah

Conservative

Overview and Scrutiny Committee

 

Reserve: 

4.  Councillor Mrs Kinnear

Reserve: 

4. Councillor Don Billson

 

Conservative

Standards Committee

 

 

Standards Committee

Councillor Mrs Kinnear

 

Reserve:          

1.  Councillor Mrs Lurline Champagnie

Councillor Mrs Lurline Champagnie

 

Reserve:

1. Councillor Paul Osborn

Conservative

 

 

Conservative

 

Name of Outside Body

 

Name of Councillor to be replaced

 

Appointee for the remainder of 2008/09

Political Group holding nomination

 

(Brent and Harrow) Trading Standards Joint Advisory Board

 

Deputy:           

Councillor Mrs Kinnear

Deputy:           

Councillor Don Billson

Conservative

London Councils’ Crime and Public Protection Panel

 

Deputy:           

Councillor Mrs Kinnear

Deputy:           

Councillor Mark Versallion

Conservative

London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee (Associated Joint Committee)

Deputy:           

Councillor Mrs Kinnear

Deputy:           

Councillor Julia Merison

Conservative

 

RESOLVED:  That the changes to the Committee memberships and Outside Body appointments, as set out above, be approved.

 

322.

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE pdf icon PDF 20 KB

A period of up to 15 minutes is allowed for asking written questions by Members of Council of a member of the Executive or the Chairman of any Committee:-

 

(i)              of which notice has been received at least two clear working days prior to the day of this Meeting; or

 

(ii)             which relate to urgent matters, and the consent of the Executive Member or Committee Chairman to whom the question is to be put has been obtained and the content has been advised to the Director of Legal and Governance Services by 12 noon on the day of the Council Meeting.

 

[Any such questions received will be tabled].

Minutes:

The following questions were submitted by Members of Council in accordance with Rule 13.2:-

 

QUESTION BY

 

QUESTION OF

TEXT OF QUESTION

(1)  Councillor Graham Henson

The Leader of the Council

(Councillor David Ashton)

“Could you tell us how much was spent in the last financial year on

 

(a)       consultants

(b)       agency staff

 

in each directorate?” 

 

(2)  Councillor Bill Stephenson

Portfolio Holder for Community and Cultural Services

(Councillor Chris Mote)

Headstone Manor is an iconic Harrow building which is mentioned over and over again in the Council’s publicity and latterly in the newly adopted Tourism Strategy.

 

Can Cllr Mote explain why the Headstone Manor Steering Group, which is overseeing the development of this important site, has not met in the last eighteen months and has only met twice under since this administration took power?

 

(3)  Councillor Phillip O’Dell

Portfolio Holder for Planning, Development and Enterprise

(Councillor Marilyn Ashton)

 

What is the reaction of the Portfolio Holder to the proposals for a light railway line in Brent?

(4)  Councillor Navin Shah

Portfolio Holder for Adults and Housing

(Councillor Barry Macleod-Cullinane)

Have you or any of your colleagues had any negotiations with the Mayor of London and/or his advisers about Harrow's target share of affordable housing in the context of 50,000 units being targeted for London?

 

(5)  Councillor Navin Shah

Portfolio Holder for Planning, Development and Enterprise

(Councillor Marilyn Ashton)

Why has Harrow Council not responded or made any representations to the planning application for a massive expansion of Brent Cross Shopping Centre?

 

[Notes:  (i)  Under the provisions of Rule 13.4, question (1) was answered orally by the Leader of the Council;

 

(ii)  further to Resolution 328 and in accordance with Rule 10.3, a written response would be provided by the relevant Portfolio Holders to questions (2), (3), (4) and (5).

 

323.

MOTION AT ITEM 14(1) - GHURKHA RIGHTS pdf icon PDF 18 KB

The following Motions have been notified in accordance with the requirements of Council Procedure Rule 15, to be moved and seconded by the Members indicated:

 

(1)               GHURKHA RIGHTS

 

 

To be moved by Councillor David Ashton and seconded by Councillors Bill Stephenson and Christopher Noyce:

 

 

This Council notes and welcomes the opening in Reading of the first UK office of the United British-Gurkha Ex-Servicemen's Association.

 

This Council notes that Gurkhas have played an active front line part in the British Army's activities in times of war and peace for nearly 200 years. In this period approximately 300,000 have fought alongside United Kingdom soldiers, with 45,000 of them being either killed or wounded.

 

This Council notes that the Government announced in September 2004 a change in immigration rules that allowed Gurkhas who had served in the British Army to settle in the United Kingdom with their families.

 

This Council notes with concern however that this offer has only been extended to cover those Gurkhas who had served at least four years and been discharged after 1st July 1997.

 

This Council believes that, given the exceptional service they have given to the United Kingdom, Gurkhas and their families should be given fast track eligibility for either the right to remain or citizenship.

 

This Council:

 

(1)   Urges Harrow M.P's to support the Campaign for Gurkha rights.

 

(2)   Instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Local Government Association to support asking them to lobby the Government on this matter.

 

(3)   Instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Prime Minister to support demanding that all retired Gurkhas who fought in the British Army, get the right to citizenship, as well as a fair deal on pensions.

 

(4)   Asks the Chief Executive to view sympathetically any request from Harrow Gurkhas for a street collection in aid of Gurkhas living in Harrow who are suffering financial hardship.

 

(5)   Asks the Chief Executive to write to Reading Borough Council thanking them for their letter and to express our support for their campaign.

 

(2)               Ceramics BA Degree - University of Westminster

 

 

To be moved by Councillor Bill Stephenson and seconded by Councillor David Ashton:

 

 

“This Council notes that the Ceramics BA Degree at the University of Westminster has a long and prestigious history.  It originally started as a pottery course in the former Harrow School of Art as part of Harrow Technical College.  In the late sixties it developed into a studio pottery course and began to gain worldwide recognition.  Supported by David Leach, the son of Bernard Leach, it became internationally acclaimed and famous and remains so.  Following the change into University of Westminster, the course became the Ceramics BA Degree.  The course is considered to be a world leader which achieves top research ratings.  Throughout its existence many Harrow residents have been taught on the course or have taught students on the course.

 

In the light of this, Council expresses its grave concern at the proposal of the University  ...  view the full agenda text for item 323.

Minutes:

(i)                   The Mayor welcomed the representative of the Royal British Legion and local Ghurkha representatives to the meeting. The Council rose to express their appreciation of the attendees.

 

(ii)                 At Item 14(1) on the Summons, the Council received a Motion in the names of Councillors David Ashton, Christopher Noyce and Navin Shah in the following terms:

 

 

This Council notes and welcomes the opening in Reading of the first UK office of the United British?Ghurkha Ex?Servicemen's Association.

 

This Council notes that Ghurkhas have played an active front line part in the British Army's activities in times of war and peace for nearly 200 years.  In this period approximately 300,000 have fought alongside United Kingdom soldiers, with 45,000 of them being either killed or wounded.

 

 

This Council notes that the Government announced in September 2004 a change in immigration rules that allowed Ghurkhas who had served in the British Army to settle in the United Kingdom with their families.

 

This Council notes with concern however that this offer has only been extended to cover those Ghurkhas who had served at least four years and been discharged after 1 July 1997.

 

 

This Council believes that, given the exceptional service they have given to the United Kingdom, Ghurkhas and their families should be given fast track eligibility for either the right to remain or citizenship.

 

 

This Council:

 

(1)                 Urges Harrow MPs to support the Campaign for Ghurkha rights.

 

(2)                 Instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Local Government Association to support asking them to lobby the Government on this matter.

 

(3)                 Instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Prime Minister to support demanding that all retired Ghurkhas who fought in the British Army, get the right to citizenship, as well as a fair deal on pensions.

 

(4)                 Asks the Chief Executive to view sympathetically any request from Harrow Ghurkhas for a street collection in aid of Ghurkhas living in Harrow who are suffering financial hardship.

 

(5)                 Asks the Chief Executive to write to Reading Borough Council thanking them for their letter and to express our support for their campaign.”

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Motion, as set out at above, be adopted.

 

[Note:  The Mayor (John Nickolay), the Deputy Mayor (Eric Silver) and Councillors Husain Akhtar, David Ashton, Marilyn Ashton, Miss Christine Bednell, Robert Benson, Don Billson, Mrs Lurline Champagnie, Mrinal Choudhury, John Cowan, Bob Currie, Mrs Margaret Davine, Mano Dharmarajah, Tony Ferrari, Keith Ferry, Archie Foulds, B E Gate, David Gawn, Mitzi Green, Susan Hall, Graham Henson, Thaya Idaikkadar, Nizam Ismail, Krishna James, Manji Kara, Ashok Kulkarni, Jean Lammiman, Barry Macleod?Cullinane, Julia Merison, Salim Miah, Mrs Myra Michael, Jerry Miles, Mrs Vina Mithani, Narinder Singh Mudhar, Joyce Nickolay, Christopher Noyce, Phillip O’Dell, Asad Omar, Paul Osborn, Anjana Patel, David Perry, Raj Ray, Richard Romain, Paul Scott, Anthony Seymour, Navin Shah, Mrs Rekha Shah, Stanley Sheinwald, Dinesh Solanki, Bill Stephenson, Mrs Sasikala Suresh, Yogesh Teli, Keeki Thammaiah, Mark Versallion, Tom Weiss and Jeremy Zeid wished to be  ...  view the full minutes text for item 323.

324.

MOTION AT ITEM 14(2) - CERAMICS BA DEGREE - UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER

Minutes:

At Item 14(2) on the Summons, the Council received a Motion in the name of Councillors Bill Stephenson and David Ashton in the following terms:

 

 

“This Council notes that the Ceramics BA Degree at the University of Westminster has a long and prestigious history.  It originally started as a pottery course in the former Harrow School of Art as part of Harrow Technical College.  In the late sixties it developed into a studio pottery course and began to gain worldwide recognition.  Supported by David Leach, the son of Bernard Leach, it became internationally acclaimed and famous and remains so.  Following the change into University of Westminster, the course became the Ceramics BA Degree.  The course is considered to be a world leader which achieves top research ratings.  Throughout its existence many Harrow residents have been taught on the course or have taught students on the course.

 

 

In the light of this, Council expresses its grave concern at the proposal of the University of Westminster to close its acclaimed Ceramics BA Degree which it would regard as an act of vandalism.

 

 

Harrow has a long tradition of high quality education in the arts, which is sustained in the very high standards of art in our local schools and colleges.

 

Council believes that the University of Westminster is the guardian of this great Harrow tradition at Higher Education level and that the Ceramics BA Degree is one of the jewels in its crown which it should do everything in its power to preserve.

 

 

Council asks the Leader of the Council and the Chief Executive to write jointly to:

 

 

(i)                   the Chairman of the Council of the University of Westminster and the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Westminster, asking them to reconsider the University’s decision to close its Ceramics BA Degree;

 

(ii)                 David Lammy, the Minister with responsibility for Higher Education, the two Harrow MPs, the Brent and Harrow London Assembly Member  and the Mayor of London asking them to intervene to stop the closure of the University of Westminster Ceramics BA Degree.”

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Motion, as set out at above, be adopted.

 

[Note: Councillors Husain Akhtar, David Ashton, Marilyn Ashton, Miss Christine Bednell, Robert Benson, Don Billson, Mrs Lurline Champagnie, Mrinal Choudhury, John Cowan, Bob Currie, Mrs Margaret Davine, Mano Dharmarajah, Tony Ferrari, Keith Ferry, Archie Foulds, B E Gate, David Gawn, Mitzi Green, Susan Hall, Graham Henson, Thaya Idaikkadar, Nizam Ismail, Krishna James, Manji Kara, Ashok Kulkarni, Jean Lammiman, Barry Macleod?Cullinane, Julia Merison, Salim Miah, Mrs Myra Michael, Jerry Miles, Mrs Vina Mithani, Narinder Singh Mudhar, Joyce Nickolay, Christopher Noyce, Phillip O’Dell, Asad Omar, Paul Osborn, Anjana Patel, David Perry, Raj Ray, Richard Romain, Paul Scott, Anthony Seymour, Navin Shah, Mrs Rekha Shah, Stanley Sheinwald, Dinesh Solanki, Bill Stephenson, Mrs Sasikala Suresh, Yogesh Teli, Keeki Thammaiah, Mark Versallion and Jeremy Zeid wished to be recorded as having voted for the substantive motion to be adopted].

 

325.

MOTION AT ITEM 14(3) - SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ACT

Minutes:

In accordance with Rule 15.2, the Council received an Urgent Motion in the names of Councillors David Ashton and Paul Osborn, which had been circulated in the tabled papers.  The Urgent Motion read as follows:

 

 

“This Council notes that the Sustainable Communities Act has particular relevance to one of its three priorities for 2009/10, that of ‘Building Stronger Communities’.  The Council thus:

 

 

(i)                   supports the bottom up process in the Sustainable Communities Act designed to allow local authorities and their communities to drive the help that central government gives in reversing community decline and promoting thriving, sustainable communities;

 

(ii)                 notes that the Act gives local authorities the power to:

 

 

Ø          make proposals to government on the action and assistance government 

Ø          must take or give to promote sustainable communities, and that

Ø          those proposals can be for a transfer of public money and function 

Ø          from central to local control;

 

 

(iii)                notes that the Act defines sustainable communities broadly:

 

 

Ø          that definition having the four aspects of

Ø          the improvement of the local economy,

Ø          protection of the environment,

Ø          promotion of social inclusion, and

Ø          participation in civic and political activity;

 

 

(iv)               notes that reasons for a local authority choosing to use the Act include gaining new assistance from government, determining that assistance, being able to argue for transfers of public monies from central to local control and involving citizens in democracy.

 

 

(v)                 resolves, having been invited to by central government in October 2008, to use the Act by preparing and submitting proposals on how central government can help by 31st July 2009.”

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Urgent Motion, as set out at above, be adopted.

 

Enc.

326.

DECISIONS TAKEN UNDER THE URGENCY PROCEDURE BY PORTFOLIO HOLDERS/LEADER AND CABINET AND USE OF SPECIAL URGENCY PROCEDURE pdf icon PDF 9 KB

In accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 23.6 and Access to Information Procedure Rule 17.3, it is a requirement to report those decisions taken as a matter of urgency and the use of the special urgency procedure since the previous Council Meeting.

 

Those requirements are met in the attached paper from the Director of Legal and Governance Services.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 15 on the Summons, the meeting received a report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services which provided a summary of the urgent decisions taken by the Leader of the Council, Portfolio Holders and Cabinet, and the use of the special urgency procedure, since the last meeting of Council on 30 October 2008.

 

RESOLVED:  That the urgent decisions taken by the Leader of the Council, Portfolio Holders and Cabinet since the last Council meeting, be noted.

 

Enc.

327.

URGENT DECISION ON A MATTER RESERVED TO COUNCIL pdf icon PDF 9 KB

The Monitoring Officer, following consultation with the Leaders of each of the Political Groups, agreed the attached urgent decisions on behalf of the Council.

 

FOR CONFIRMATION

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Legal and Governance Services advised of an urgent decision he had taken in respect of a matter reserved to Council, following consultation with the Chairman and Nominated Member of the Licensing and General Purposes Committee, since the last meeting of Council held on 30 October 2008.

 

RESOLVED:  That the decision taken under delegation by the Director of Legal and Governance Services, on behalf of Council, be noted.

 

328.

PROCEDURE FOR TERMINATION OF MEETING

Minutes:

(i)                   At 10.28 pm, during the debate on the Item 13 (Questions with Notice) of the Summons, the Mayor put to the vote a procedural motion under Rule 10.2(ii) that the closure of time for the Council meeting be extended until the completion of all remaining business on the Summons.  Upon a formal vote, this proposal was not agreed;

 

(ii)                 At 10.29 pm, in the course of the consideration of Item 13 (Questions with Notice), the Mayor advised that the ‘guillotine’ procedure had come into operation for the determination of the remaining business on the summons and was applied to Items 13 (Questions with Notice), 14(3) (Sustainable Communities Act), 15 (Decisions Taken Under the Urgency Procedure by Portfolio Holders/Leader and Cabinet and Use of Special Urgency Procedure) and 16 (Urgent Decision on a Matter reserved to Council).

 

RESOLVED:  That the provisions of Rules 10.2 and 10.3 be applied as set out at (i) and (ii) above.

 

Appendix I - Declarations of Interest pdf icon PDF 14 KB

Appendix II - Budget Summary 2009-10 pdf icon PDF 16 KB

Appendix III - HRA Account 2009-10 - 2011-12 pdf icon PDF 18 KB

Appendix IV - Members' Allowances Scheme 2009-10 pdf icon PDF 34 KB