Agenda and minutes

Council - Thursday 10 July 2008 7.30 pm

Venue: Council Chamber Harrow Civic Centre

Contact: Pauline Ferris, Senior Professional - Democratic Services (Council)  Tel: 020 8424 1269 E-mail:  pauline.ferris@harrow.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

269.

COUNCIL MINUTES pdf icon PDF 226 KB

To take the minutes of the Annual Council held on 8 May 2008 and of the Extraordinary Council held on 5 June 2008 as read and signed as a correct record.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the Annual meeting held on 8 May 2008 and Extraordinary meeting held on 5 June 2008 be taken as read and signed as correct records.

 

270.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

To receive declarations of personal or prejudicial interests arising from business to be transacted at this meeting from all members of the Council.

 

Minutes:

The Mayor invited appropriate declarations of interests by Members of the Council in respect of the business on the Summons.

 

Councillor Salim Miah declared a personal interest in relation to Item 10 (Local Authorities (Alcohol Consumption in Designated Places) Regulations 2007) as a Licensee.

 

Councillor Graham Henson declared a personal interest in relation to Item 16(2) (Motion – Post Offices) as an employee of that organisation.

 

Councillor B E Gate declared a personal interest in relation to Item 16(3) (Motion – Healthcare in London) as two of his family members were employed by General Practitioner Clinics within Harrow.

 

The Deputy Mayor (Councillor Eric Silver) also declared a personal interest in relation to item 16(3) (Motion – Healthcare in London) as a Primary Care Trust contractor.

 

271.

MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS pdf icon PDF 29 KB

To receive any announcements from the Mayor.

 

[Note:  Information as to recent Mayoral engagements will be tabled].

 

Minutes:

The Mayor spoke briefly on several of his upcoming engagements, including the reintroduction of the Annual Battle of Britain Service to be held on 14 September 2008, requesting that Members note the engagements within their diaries.

 

The Mayor then spoke on a recent event he had attended to mark the retirement of Mr Chris Murphy, who had been employed by the Council for 47½ years.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 the report of the Worshipful the Mayor upon his official duties, as tabled, be noted and received;

 

(2)                 the Mayor write, on behalf of the Council, to congratulate Mr Chris Murphy on his long service to Harrow Council and to wish him an enjoyable retirement.

 

272.

COUNCILLOR JOHN COWAN

Minutes:

Members of the Council expressed their pleasure at Councillor Cowan’s return to meetings of the Council and unanimously welcomed him back.

 

273.

PROCEDURAL MOTIONS

To receive and consider any procedural motions by Members of the Council in relation to the conduct of this Meeting.

 

[Note:  Notice of any such procedural motions received after the issuing of this Summons will be tabled].

 

Minutes:

(i)                   Councillor Bill Stephenson moved a procedural motion under the general provisions of Rule 15.6 that the Motion included at Item 16(1) (Harrow Town Centre) of the Summons and indicated to stand referred to the next meeting of the Executive, as being a matter within its remit, should rather be considered at this Council meeting.  Upon a vote, the procedural motion was not carried.

 

(ii)                 Councillor Bill Stephenson asked why a question from Councillor Bob Currie under the provisions of Rule 13 had been ruled out of order by the Mayor on the grounds that it would require the disclosure of exempt information, given that the matter to be discussed was in the public domain.  The Mayor advised that when he had initially excluded the question the information it referred to was not in the public domain and exempt from disclosure.  However, he accepted that this position had changed and he therefore intended to allow the question to be asked under Item 15, but noted that it would be subject to written response by the Portfolio Holder.

 

(iii)                The Mayor took this opportunity to announce that following the issue of the Council Summons, he had agreed, under Council Procedure Rule 7.2, to the addition of a new item of business to the Summons, namely “Item 14(a) – Amendments to Committee and Outside Body Appointments”.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 the procedural motion under Rule 15.6, seeking the consideration at this meeting of the Motion at 16(1) of the Summons (Harrow Town Centre) (Resolution 286 refers), be not agreed;

 

(2)                 the question from Councillor Bob Currie under the provisions of Rule 13 be asked under Item 15 (Resolution 285 refers) as the information was now in the public domain.

 

274.

PETITIONS

To receive any petitions to be presented:

 

(i)                 by a representative of the petitioners;

(ii)               by a Councillor, on behalf of petitioners; or

(iii)             by the Mayor, on behalf of petitioners.

 

Minutes:

In accordance with Rule 11, the following petitions were presented:-

 

(1)

By members of the public:

 

 

(i)                   Submitted by Mr Barankar containing 13 signatures of residents, calling upon the Council to urgently amend the waiting times in High Road, Harrow Weald, covering properties numbered 205-227, to finish at 6.30pm in order to assist the traders to continue to run their businesses and to help boost the economic vitality and vibrancy of Harrow.

 

 

[The petition stood referred to the Portfolio Holder for Environment Services and Community Safety].

 

 

(ii)                 Submitted by Ms Freeman containing 112 signatures of residents, requesting that the Cabinet reconsider its decision to transfer residential services run by Harrow Consortium for Special Needs to Support for Living.

 

 

[The petition stood referred to the Cabinet].

 

(2)

By Members of Council on behalf of Petitioners:

 

 

(i)                   Submitted by Councillor Noyce containing 33 signatures of residents, objecting to Planning Application P/1885/08DFU for the conversion of a single family dwelling house into two separate flats.

 

 

[The petition stood referred to the Development Management Committee].

 

 

(ii)                 Submitted by Councillor Noyce containing 34 signatures of residents, objecting to a Planning Application for 15 The Close.

 

 

[The petition stood referred to the Development Management Committee].

 

 

(iii)                Submitted by Councillor Solanki containing 1,430 signatures of residents, requesting that the Council seek to enable the return of Dr Kurien on a long term contract back at the local parade of Mollison Way, so that continuity of patient care and accessibility to the doctor’s surgery is not compromised.

 

 

[The petition stood referred to the Portfolio Holders for Adults and Housing, Children’s Services and Community and Cultural Services].

 

275.

PUBLIC QUESTIONS pdf icon PDF 12 KB

A period of up to 15 minutes is allowed for members of the public to ask questions of members of the Executive, Portfolio Holders and Chairmen of Committees, of which notice has been received no later than 5.00 pm two clear working days prior to the day of this Meeting.

 

[Note:  Any such questions received will be tabled].

 

Minutes:

The following question had been submitted by a member of the public in accordance with Rule 12.3:-

 

QUESTION BY

 

QUESTION OF

TEXT OF QUESTION

Debbie Alway

Portfolio Holder for Adults and Housing

(Councillor Barry Macleod-Cullinane)

“I have received a  letter from First Call concerning 'Investigating tenant management', which says "Unless you join the TMO you will be unable to vote later when it is decided if the TMO is to go ahead."  Surely this cannot be correct?

 

Everyone in the borough who is affected by this issue (be they tenants or leaseholders) should be entitled to vote, whether they have joined the TMO or not.  The problem with joining the TMO is that the act of joining is considered by the TMO as being tacit approval of its existence”

 

[Note:  Under the provisions of Rule 12.7, the question was answered orally by the Portfolio Holder.  The member of the public asked a supplementary question, which was also answered orally].

 

276.

ETHICAL STANDARDS pdf icon PDF 9 KB

Recommendation I:

Standards Committee

(5 June 2008)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 7 on the Summons, the Council considered Recommendation I from the Standards Committee meeting held on 5 June 2008, which sought to revise its terms of reference and operating arrangements in relation to the new system for handling complaints against Members and issues that required addressing by the Council, arising from the requirements of the Local Government and Public Involvement In Health Act 2007.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)                 the revised Terms of Reference be approved and adopted into the Constitution, as detailed in Appendix 1 to these Minutes;

 

(2)                 the membership of the Assessment and Review Sub-Committees be three persons, comprising one independent member, who shall Chair the meeting, and two elected Members reflecting political proportionality where possible;

 

(3)                 the membership of the Hearing Sub-Committee remain as five persons (whenever possible) comprising three independent members, one of whom shall Chair the meeting.   This Sub-Committee should be politically balanced whenever possible.  This Sub-Committee shall be quorate when one independent and one elected member from each political party on the Standards Committee are present;

 

(4)                 the members of the Standards Committee shall form a pool from which the membership of all the Sub-Committees shall be drawn;

 

(5)                 the Monitoring Officer should prepare a pre-assessment report in relation to any complaint for consideration by the Assessment Sub-Committee;

 

(6)                 the criteria for the preparation of the Pre?assessment Report, Assessing Complaints, and Referrals to the Standards Board for England be approved;

 

(7)                 the member complained about should be informed of the complaint as soon as possible after the meeting of the Assessment Sub-Committee;

 

(8)                 the process be reviewed by Standards Committee in March 2009.

 

277.

PROTOCOL FOR PLANNING COMMITTEES pdf icon PDF 9 KB

Recommendation II:

Standards Committee

(5 June 2008)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

At Item 8 on the Summons, the Council received Recommendation II from the Standards Committee meeting held on 5 June 2008 to add the following paragraphs for Early Engagement on Strategic Planning Applications into the Protocol for Planning Committees, in line with the guidance contained within “Connecting Councillors with Strategic Planning Applications”:

 

“Early Engagement on Strategic Applications

 

1.

Since 2003 the complexity of the planning process has increased considerably particularly in respect of major applications which can require Environmental Assessments, Access and Design Statements, Transport Assessments, Viability ‘Toolkits’, Energy Statements, Children’s Play statements etc.  The numbers of major applications which are currently in the pipeline is far above what has previously been the norm for the authority, and the pressure to deal with these in a timely manner within Government targets remains.

 

2.

To enable members to understand large scale applications and their implications the officers consider that they should have the opportunity to ask questions, raise issues and meet applicants, both prior to submission and between submission and determination.  However, to avoid any problems of probity this engagement needs to be carefully managed. This approach is recommended in a leaflet published by London Councils, The Government Office for London and London First in November 2007. 

 

3.

Officers are recommending that applicants for major strategic schemes should be invited to make a presentation to members of the Committee and reserves, at which they should explain their proposals and answer questions of fact.  Such presentations may also involve a site visit, and where necessary site visits for strategic proposals should be arranged prior to Committee meetings where the proposal is to be considered.  At such presentations there should be no debate about the merits or otherwise of the scheme.

 

4.

At least one senior officer should be present at all such meetings and may be called upon to answer any factual questions about policy issues etc.

 

Such meetings can be at either pre- or post-application stages and in some instances both may be appropriate.  Similar meetings may also be arranged for ward/backbench members and members of the Executive.”

 

RESOLVED:  That the additional paragraphs be adopted as printed and included in the Protocol.

 

278.

BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE PLAN pdf icon PDF 9 KB

Recommendation I:

Cabinet  

(19 June 2008)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 9 on the Summons, the Council received Recommendation I of the Cabinet meeting held on 19 June 2008 on this matter.

 

The Recommendation was formally moved by the Leader (Councillor David Ashton).

 

RESOLVED:  That the Best Value Performance Plan be approved and adopted.

 

279.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES (ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN DESIGNATED PLACES) REGULATIONS 2007 pdf icon PDF 10 KB

Recommendation I:

Licensing & General Purposes Committee

(23 June 2008)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

In relation to Item 10 on the Summons, the Council received a Recommendation from the Licensing and General Purposes Committee meeting held on 23 June 2008.

 

The Recommendation was formally moved by Councillor Mrs Lurline Champagnie.

 

RESOLVED:  That the existing Controlled Drinking Zone be extended to cover the whole of the Borough and that the current Zone be withdrawn on the date of implementation of the new Zone.

 

280.

OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE - TERMS OF REFERENCE pdf icon PDF 9 KB

Recommendation I:

Overview & Scrutiny Committee

(10 June 2008)

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Item 12 on the Summons, the Council received a Recommendation from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting held on 10 June 2008 to effect a change in its Terms of Reference.

 

The Recommendation was formally moved by Councillor Stanley Sheinwald.

 

RESOLVED:  That the Terms of Reference of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, as amended, be approved and adopted into the Constitution, as detailed in Appendix 2 to these Minutes.

 

281.

SCRUTINY ANNUAL REPORT 2007/08 pdf icon PDF 15 KB

Recommendation I:

Overview & Scrutiny Committee

(8 July 2008)

 

[NOTE: The recommendation of Overview & Scrutiny Committee will be tabled.  A copy of the Annual Report is circulated with the background papers]

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

(i)         Council received Recommendation I of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting on 8 July 2008, which had been circulated in the tabled documentation for the meeting.  The Scrutiny Annual Report 2007/08 had been circulated previously.

 

(ii)         The Recommendation was formally moved by Councillor Stanley Sheinwald.

 

(iii)        During consideration of this item, questions under Council Procedure Rule 13.1 (Questions Without Notice) were asked by Councillors Phillip O’Dell and Navin Shah, to which oral answers were provided.

 

RESOLVED:  That the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s Annual Report for 2007/08 be adopted.

 

282.

OPERATION AND PROVISIONS FOR CALL-IN AND URGENCY pdf icon PDF 38 KB

Report of the Chief Executive attached.

 

Minutes:

In accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 23 which required Members to monitor annually the operation of the provisions for call-in and urgency, the meeting received a report of the Chief Executive on this matter.

 

RESOLVED:  That the operation of the call-in and urgency procedures, as now reported, be noted.

 

283.

APPOINTMENTS TO VACANCIES - REPRESENTATIVES ON OUTSIDE BODIES

To receive proposals as to the appointment to vacancies for representatives of the Authority to serve on Outside Bodies for the remainder of the Municipal Year 2008/09.

 

Harrow Refugee Forum

Councillor Christopher Noyce

(1 representative from each Political Group)

 

North London Collegiate

Councillor John Cowan

 

FOR DECISION

 

Minutes:

Item 16 on the Summons provided for the receipt of proposals from the Political Groups as to the appointment of representatives of the Authority to two vacancies on outside bodies for the remainder of the Municipal Year 2008/09.

 

RESOLVED:  That the following appointments for the remainder of the Municipal Year 2008/09 be approved:

 

Name of Outside Body

 

Name of Councillor

Harrow Refugee and Minorities Forum

 

Councillor Christopher Noyce

North London Collegiate School Board of Governors

Councillor John Cowan

 

284.

AMENDMENTS TO COMMITTEE AND OUTSIDE BODY APPOINTMENTS pdf icon PDF 19 KB

The Mayor has agreed, in accordance with Rule 7.2, to accept the additional Item submitted in accordance with Rule 14.1.

 

FOR DECISION

Minutes:

Further to Resolution 273 above, the Leader, under the general provisions of Rule 14.1, moved proposals for various amendments to committee memberships and outside body appointments, which were agreed, as follows:

 

Name of Committee

Name of Councillor to be replaced

Appointee for the

remainder of 2008/09

Political Group holding nomination

 

Overview and Scrutiny Committee

 

Reserve:

1. Councillor Eric Silver

5. Councillor Lurline Champagnie

Reserve:

1. Councillor Julia Merison

5. Councillor G Chowdhury

 

Conservative

Overview and Scrutiny Committee

Reserve:

1. Councillor Bill Stephenson

 

Reserve:

1. Councillor Krishna James

Labour

Standards Committee

 

Councillor Phillip O’Dell

 

Reserve:

2. Councillor Asad Omar

 

Councillor Asad Omar

 

Reserve:

2. Councillor Phillip O’Dell

 

Labour

Licensing and General Purposes

Nominated Member:

Councillor Mrinal Choudhury

 

Nominated Member:

Councillor Phillip O’Dell

Labour

Development Management Committee

Councillor Mrinal Choudhury

 

Reserves:

1. Cllr David Gawn

3. Cllr Mrs Rekha Shah

 

Councillor Krishna James

 

Reserves:

1. Cllr Mrinal Choudhury

3. Cllr Jerry Miles

 

Labour

Strategic Planning Committee

Nominated Member:

Councillor Keith Ferry

 

 

Reserves:

1.Cllr David Gawn

2.Cllr Graham Henson

3.Cllr Mrs Rekha Shah

Nominated Member:

Councillor Thaya Idaikkadar

 

Reserves:

1.Cllr Graham Henson

2.Cllr Krishna James

3.Cllr Jerry Miles

 

Labour

 

 

 

Name of Outside Body

Name of Councillor to be replaced

Appointee for the remainder of 2008/09

Political Group holding nomination

 

Age Concern Harrow

 

Councillor Krishna James

Councillor Asad Omar

Labour

Harrow Police and Community Consultative Group

 

Councillor Navin Shah

Councillor Mano Dharmarajah

Labour

Associated Joint Committee (London Councils Grants Committee)

 

Cllr Manji Kara

Cllr Golam Chowdhury

Cllr Joyce Nickolay

Cllr Don Billson

 

Cllr Paul Osborn

Cllr Marilyn Ashton

Cllr Anjana Patel

(deleted)

Conservative

 

Harrow College Further Education Board

Cllr Anjana Patel

Cllr John Cowan

Conservative

 

RESOLVED:  That the changes to the committee memberships and outside body appointments, as set out above, be approved.

 

285.

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE pdf icon PDF 11 KB

A period of up to 15 minutes is allowed for asking written questions by Members of Council of a member of the Executive or the Chairman of any Committee:-

 

(i)                 of which notice has been received at least two clear working days prior to the day of this Meeting; or

 

(ii)               which relate to urgent matters, and the consent of the Executive Member or Committee Chairman to whom the question is to be put has been obtained and the content has been advised to the Director of Legal and Governance Services by 12 noon on the day of the Council Meeting.

 

[Any such questions received will be tabled].

 

Minutes:

(1)        The following question had been submitted by a Member of Council under Rule 13.2:-

 

QUESTION BY

 

QUESTION OF

TEXT OF QUESTION

Councillor Krishna James

Portfolio Holder for Environment Services & Community Safety

(Councillor Susan Hall)

Recently the Council has financed extra policing for Harrow Town Centre, a move which I welcome.   However Wealdstone High Street is experiencing a lot of antisocial behaviour and violent crime.


Will you also look at putting in extra police in Wealdstone High Street to cope with this problem, possibly by using some of the police from the Town Centre or preferably with extra police over and above this?

 

[Notes:  (i)  Under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 13.4, the question was answered orally by the Portfolio Holder;

 

(ii)  under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 13.5, the Member asked a supplementary question, which was also answered orally].

 

(2)        Further to Resolution 273 above, the following question which had also been submitted by a Member of Council under Rule 13.2 but initially ruled out of order, was asked:-

 

QUESTION BY

 

QUESTION OF

TEXT OF QUESTION

Councillor Bob Currie

Portfolio Holder for Adults and Housing

(Councillor Barry Macleod-Cullinane)

Recently Kier has admitted not adhering to Health and Safety Executive regulations in disposing of asbestos within some of the Council properties in 2-65 Brookside Close.  Has the Council investigated whether other Council properties have also been involved and, if so, which ones?

 

[Note:  The Portfolio Holder undertook to respond fully in writing to the Member and all Members of Council].

 

286.

MOTION AT ITEM 16(1) - HARROW TOWN CENTRE pdf icon PDF 10 KB

The following Motions have been notified in accordance with the requirements of Council Procedure Rule 15, to be moved and seconded by the Members indicated:-

 

(1)               Harrow Town Centre

 

 

To be moved by Councillor Bill Stephenson and seconded by Councillor Keith Ferry:

 

 

“This Council is concerned that Harrow Town centre is rapidly moving to becoming a high-rise, overdeveloped jungle of flats – the prime example so far being the development on the Gayton Road site promoted by Harrow Council, which has met with universal condemnation by Harrow residents.  There is no overall master plan for the development of the Town Centre and its infrastructure or for the provision of any new leisure facilities.

 

Council notes and supports the commitments made by the new Mayor of London during the recent GLA campaign to protect Outer London boroughs from high-rise buildings and over development and to place greater emphasis on providing a higher proportion of family size dwellings, and calls on him to honour his election pledge when considering major developments in Harrow”

 

 

(2)               Post Offices

 

 

To be moved by Councillor Bill Stephenson and seconded by Councillor Navin Shah:

 

 

“This Council notes with dismay and condemns the decision by Post Office Ltd to close five post offices in Harrow following a cosmetic consultation exercise where well-argued cases and the real views of Harrow residents were totally ignored and the results were predictably predetermined.  Council believes that these decisions will have disastrous consequences for many local shopping centres and as well as for many vulnerable people who rely on their local post offices, and no account has been taken of potential residential developments such those in the Town Centre and, for example, on the Kodak site.

 

Council regrets that the former Mayor of London’s initiative to instigate a judicial review of the decision by Post Office Ltd on the grounds of their failure to consult properly in terms of the timescale has been unsuccessful

 

 

Council notes that the Town Centre Post Office is currently quite unfit for purpose being far too small with long queues and will be even more so in the light of proposed residential developments in the Town Centre.

 

Council also notes that Post Office Ltd is willing to enter into agreements with Local Authorities to take over the running of local post offices.

 

Council resolves:

 

1.            To communicate the above resolution to Post Office Ltd, the two Harrow MPs, the Brent and Harrow Assembly Member and to the appropriate Government minister.

 

2.            To seek a meeting with Post Office Ltd to discuss the Town Centre Post Office and the need for other post offices in Harrow in the light of plans for residential development throughout the Borough.

 

3.     To ask the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, building on the work it has already done, to urgently set up a review group to consider the possibility of the Council taking over the running of the post offices currently threatened with closure and/or opening its own post office”.

 

 

(3)               Healthcare for  ...  view the full agenda text for item 286.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 15.6, it was

 

RESOLVED:  That the Motion at item 16(1) of the Summons stand referred to the next meeting of the Executive (in particular the Local Development Framework Panel), as being a matter within the remit of the Executive.

 

287.

MOTION AT ITEM 16(2) - POST OFFICES

Minutes:

(i)                   At Item 16(2) on the Summons, the Council received a Motion in the names of Councillors Bill Stephenson and Navin Shah.

 

(ii)                 The Motion was the subject of a cross party amendment in the names of Councillor Bill Stephenson and David Ashton, which sought to amend the Motion to read as follows:-

 

 

“This Council strongly deplores the decision by Post Office Ltd to close five post offices in Harrow following a cosmetic consultation exercise where well-argued views and serious concerns of Harrow residents were totally ignored and the predetermined outcomes were achieved which most adversely affect vulnerable people who greatly rely on their local post offices.

 

 

Council notes that the Town Centre Post Office is currently quite unfit for purpose being far too small with long queues and will be even more so in the light of the closures and of the proposed residential developments in the Town Centre.

 

 

Council also notes that Post Office Ltd is willing to enter into agreements with Local Authorities to take over the running of local post offices.

 

Council resolves:

 

 

(1)                 To communicate the above resolution to Post Office Ltd as well as to the Harrow MPs and to the appropriate Government minister.

 

 

(2)                 To further explore the feasibility of Council running some local post offices.

 

 

(3)                 To seek a meeting with Post Office Ltd to discuss the Town Centre Post Office and the need for other post offices in Harrow in the light of plans for residential development.

 

(iii)                The amendment, and subsequently the amended substantive Motion, were agreed by general assent.

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Motion, as amended and set out at (ii) above, be adopted.

 

288.

MOTION AT 16(3) - HEALTHCARE FOR LONDON

Minutes:

(i)                   At Item 16(3) on the Summons, the Council received a Motion in the names of CouncillorsMrs Vina Mithani and Councillor Mrs Lurline Champagnie.

 

(ii)                 The Motion was the subject of a cross party amendment in the names of Councillors Mrs Vina Mithani and Councillor Mrs Rekha Shah, which sought to amend the Motion to read as follows:-

 

 

“This Council is concerned at the dramatic implications of the proposed changes to the NHS as contained in the Darzi Report, ‘Healthcare for London’, especially the possible imposition of polyclinics - perceived as a “one size fits all” model - with the potential to seriously damage the established pattern of provision of the general practitioner, which for decades has underpinned the provision of the basic healthcare needs of every individual “from conception to death”.

 

 

Council welcomes the assurances from our local health partners that Harrow does not face the prospect of such an imposition. However, Council resolves to oppose any local proposals:

 

 

(i)                   if they fail to take into account local needs,

 

(ii)                 if they undermine local GP practices and existing local health facilities,

 

(iii)                if stakeholders and residents have not been properly consulted and listened to. 

 

 

Council resolves to communicate this motion to the two Harrow MPs, the Chief Executive of NHS London and the Minister of Health, in order to express its deep concerns over this issue.

 

(iii)                The amendment, and subsequently the amended substantive Motion, were agreed by general assent.

 

RESOLVED:  That the substantive Motion, as amended and set out above, be adopted.

 

289.

DECISIONS UNDER THE URGENCY PROCEDURE AND USE OF SPECIAL URGENCY PROCEDURE pdf icon PDF 42 KB

Minutes:

Further to Item 17 on the Summons, the meeting received a report of the Director of Legal and Governance Services which provided a summary of the urgent decisions taken by Portfolio Holders and the Leader and the use of the special urgency procedure, since the last ordinary meeting of Council on 21 February 2008.

 

RESOLVED:  That the urgent decisions taken by the Portfolio Holders and the Leader since the Council meeting on 21 February 2008 be noted.

 

Appendix 1 - Standards Cttees Terms of Reference pdf icon PDF 21 KB

Appendix 2 - Overview and Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference pdf icon PDF 17 KB