Agenda and minutes

(Special), Development Control Committee - Tuesday 18 May 2004 6.30 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, Harrow Civic Centre

Contact: Rebecca Arnold, Committee Administrator  Tel: 020 8424 1269 E-mail:  rebecca.arnold@harrow.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

PART I - RECOMMENDATIONS - NIL

PART II - MINUTES

587.

Appointment of Chair

To note the appointment at the Annual Meeting of Council on 13 May 2004 (subject to confirmation of that decision) of a Chair of this Committee for the Municipal Year 2004/05 under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 1.1 xii (or now to make an appointment).

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note the appointment under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 1.1(xii) of Councillor Anne Whitehead as Chair of the Development Control Committee for the 2004/2005 Municipal Year, as agreed at the Annual Council Meeting held on 13 May 2004.

588.

Attendance by Reserve Members

To note the attendance at this meeting of any duly appointed Reserve Members.

 

[Note: The Members and Reserve Members of the Committee for the 2004/2005 Municipal Year are as appointed by the Annual Council Meeting of 13 May 2004].

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note the attendance at this meeting of the following duly appointed Reserve Member:-

 

Ordinary Member

 

Reserve Member

Councillor Miles

Councillor Ismail

Councillor Knowles

Councillor Kara

589.

Appointment of a Vice-Chair

To appoint a Vice-Chair of the Committee for the 2004/2005 Municipal Year.

 

[Note: The Conservative Group has nominated Councillor Marilyn Ashton to this office].

Minutes:

Councillor Marilyn Ashton was nominated and seconded.  No other nominations were received at this point.  Upon being put to a vote, the nomination was not carried.

 

Subsequently, Councillor Bluston was nominated and seconded.  Upon being put to a vote, it was

 

RESOLVED:  To appoint Councillor Bluston as Vice-Chair of the Development Control Committee for the 2004/2005 Municipal Year.

590.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations of personal and prejudicial interests (if any) from Members of the Committee arising from the business to be transacted at this agenda.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note that there were no declarations of interests made by Members in relation to the business to be transacted at this meeting.

591.

Minutes

To agree that the approval of the minutes of the meeting held on 21 April 2004 be deferred to the next ordinary meeting of the Committee.

Minutes:

RESOLVED: That the approval of the minutes of the meeting held on 21 April 2004 be deferred to the next ordinary meeting of the Committee to be held at 7.30 pm that evening.

592.

Right of Members to Speak

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That, in accordance with Committee Procedure Rule 4.1, Councillors David Ashton and Mrs Kinnear, who were not Members of the Committee, be allowed to speak on Item 6 on the agenda (Minute 593 refers). 

593.

Planning and Development Improvement Plan 2004/05 - 2006/07 pdf icon PDF 11 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee received a report of the Chief Planning Officer and a reference from the  Cabinet meeting held on 20 April 2004 regarding the Planning and Development Improvement Plan 2004/05 – 2006/07, which had been deferred from consideration at the previous meeting of the Committee held on 21 April 2004.  The Chief Planning Officer explained that the Plan demonstrated how performance of the Planning and Development function could be improved and the resources required to achieve those improvements.

 

The Chief Planning Officer reported that the Improvement Plan also addressed the problems of heavy workload in the Forward Planning and the Building Control Services.  He added that it was important to maintain the excellent reputation of the Council’s Building Control Service which was considered to be one of the best in London.

 

He explained that the commitment and support of the Council’s IT Service would be necessary in the implementation of the Plan.  He drew attention to the reference from Cabinet and asked Members to agree the following additional recommendation:

 

“That an early report on a revised scheme of delegation be submitted to the Development Control Committee for its consideration.”

 

He assured Members that the concerns by Cabinet over additional training for Members in Year 3, when local government elections in London might bring in new Councillors, was being addressed.

 

In response to questions from Members, the Chief Planning Officer stated that the improvements in IT would, when fully implemented, amongst other things,

 

·                     allow electronic displays of plans at meetings of this Committee

 

·                     help achieve an electronic application processing system, a facet which would allow members of the public to submit applications and comments electronically.

 

He added that £50k had been set aside for development of the system and that in the order of £100k would be required in Year 2 to achieve improvements in the system.  He informed Members that officers had looked at the IT systems used by other local authorities and stated that the services of an IT consultant, who was also a  specialist in the Planning field, had been engaged by Harrow.

 

He assured Members that the information available on the system would be the same as that currently available on the existing planning files.

 

In response to further questions from Members, the Chief Planning Officer reported that

 

·                     as a result of the problems in recruitment of planning staff, an allowance had been made in Year 1 for the employment of agency staff

 

·                     the amount of Planning Delivery Grant (PDG) likely to be received in 2005/6 was dependent mainly on improvement in the performance of the Development Control service

 

·                     the PDG was also dependent on the progress made towards adopting the Unitary Development Plan and making progress towards the replacement Local Development Framework, and meeting e?government targets

 

·                     in comparison with other local authorities, Harrow Council’s performance on deciding minor planning applications within eight weeks was poor

 

·                     the providers of our existing IT systems appeared slow in meeting the pace of change and the new challenges

 

·                     that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 593.